By Kingsley Ogbeide-Ihama
Reflecting on former governor Obaseki’s governance style, it is now apparent why he had reservations about politicizing the management of the state, knowing the inherent danger such an approach could pose to Edo’s growth and development.
By steadfastly adhering to his convictions, Obaseki inevitably made political enemies. His refusal to conform to the traditional pattern of patronage-based politics fueled determined efforts to unseat him and dislodge his interest of growing the State along his convinctions. And his approach—governing based on competence rather than political loyalty—was seen as an anomaly within the established political framework.
During the campaign to elect Obaseki’s successor, Monday Okpevbolo of the All Progressive Congress (APC) centered his message on reversing Obaseki’s policy of prioritizing merit over political considerations. Okpevbolo argued that governance should cater not just to all Edo citizens but should also reflect the interests of party members who played a role in securing electoral victory.
However, it cannot be overstated that effective governance extends beyond partisan appointments; it must serve the broader interests of the populace. And, today, Governor Okpevbolo finds himself caught between suspending political appointees and dissolving committees due to their failure to meet public expectations. These challenges highlight the difficulty of balancing political obligations with the responsibility of providing quality governance.
With the benefit of hindsight, it is evident that being pronounced the ‘Elected’ does not necessarily translate into effective governance if decision-making is dominated by a select group of political players driven by a sense of patronage and brute force. Leadership requires the ability to navigate conflicting interests while maintaining a focus on the greater good.
Governor Okpevbolo is currently burdened by an electoral victory being contested at the tribunal. Under such circumstances, he is naturally seeking political support and public sympathy. However, will Edo residents patiently wait for him to take decisive action, or will they grow restless? That remains an open question.
Are there lessons to be learned? Certainly—about leadership and the pitfalls of presuming expertise in areas where deeper understanding is lacking.
As Obaseki maintains a stoic silence, he may be reflecting on the Latin phrase: Faciam quod potui; qui meliora potest, faciat—”I have done what I could; let him who can do better, do better.” This phrase, attributed to the Roman statesman and philosopher Cicero, conveys humility and an openness to improvement.
But beyond the political calculations and power struggles, leadership is ultimately about service—about leaving behind a legacy that withstands the test of time. The true measure of governance is not found in party loyalty or fleeting victories, but in the impact on the lives of the people. And in the quiet moments of reflection, history will remember not just who held power, but who used it wisely.
Leave a Reply